logo
g Text Version
Beauty & Self
Books & Music
Career
Computers
Education
Family
Food & Wine
Health & Fitness
Hobbies & Crafts
Home & Garden
Money
News & Politics
Relationships
Religion & Spirituality
Sports
Travel & Culture
TV & Movies

dailyclick
Bored? Games!
Nutrition
Postcards
Take a Quiz
Rate My Photo

new
Action Movies
Bible Basics
Houseplants
Romance Movies
Creativity
Family Travel
Southwest USA


dailyclick
All times in EST

Full Schedule
g
g Republican Party Site

BellaOnline's Republican Party Editor

g

Three fifths compromise

Guest Author - Stacy Wiegman

The three-fifths compromise has been disparaged by liberals because it is "offensive." Let's examine that and once again marvel at the mastery of the founding fathers.

For those who don't know, let me briefly explain that the "three-fifths compromise." In 1787, delegates to the Constitutional convention were arguing over representation and how to count people. Most slaves were in the South. Indeed, slavery was banned in the Northern territories (Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota today).

Of course, population equals power in our government as the House of Representatives is apportioned based on population. The Northern delegates would be very outnumbered if the South counted everyone.

Even at that time, there was great unease about the practice of slavery. Many of the Founding Fathers were opposed to slavery, such as Patrick Henry. But there were big issues to uniting the states into one nation, and abolishing slavery was not the top of the list.

The Southern delegates wanted to count every slave as one person, which would have given them a large majority in the House of Representatives. The North argued not to count slaves at all since they could not vote. The compromise named the "three-fifths compromise" states that slaves were to be counted as 3/5ths of a person for purposes of representation and taxation.

There is a strange argument that the "three-fifths compromise" is racist. Considering that it was the Southern delegates, who owned slaves, who wanted to count their slaves as whole people should put that argument to rest. Clearly, they wanted them counted for purposes of power.

The North needed the South for many reasons. The biggest reason was food. The climate in the Southern states was and is much more conducive to producing crops than the Northern climate. The South felt that because their crops were so essential, they should have more say in the government. Making a compromise on the census kept the union together. But the South was more of a "states' rights" mindset, which was contrary at that time to the Northern idea of a centrist government. Arguments over the different philosophies led to secession of seven Southern states before Abraham Lincoln took office.

In the end, a Republican president, Abraham Lincoln, made the executive decision to free the slaves with the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863. And the 14th Amendment, adopted in 1868, made the Three-fifths compromise a thing of the past.
This site needs an editor - click to learn more!

Add Three+fifths+compromise to Twitter Add Three+fifths+compromise to Facebook Add Three+fifths+compromise to MySpace Add Three+fifths+compromise to Del.icio.us Digg Three+fifths+compromise Add Three+fifths+compromise to Yahoo My Web Add Three+fifths+compromise to Google Bookmarks Add Three+fifths+compromise to Stumbleupon Add Three+fifths+compromise to Reddit




RSS | Related Articles | Editor's Picks Articles | Top Ten Articles | Previous Features | Site Map


For FREE email updates, subscribe to the Republican Party Newsletter


Past Issues


print
Printer Friendly
bookmark
Bookmark
tell friend
Tell a Friend
forum
Forum
email
Email Editor


Content copyright © 2014 by Stacy Wiegman. All rights reserved.
This content was written by Stacy Wiegman. If you wish to use this content in any manner, you need written permission. Contact BellaOnline Administration for details.

g


g features
What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

Where Did They Go?

The Politics of Global Warming

Archives | Site Map

forum
Forum
email
Contact

Past Issues
memberscenter


vote
Poetry
Daily
Weekly
Monthly
Less than Monthly



BellaOnline on Facebook
g


| About BellaOnline | Privacy Policy | Advertising | Become an Editor |
Website copyright © 2014 Minerva WebWorks LLC. All rights reserved.


BellaOnline Editor