logo
g Text Version
Beauty & Self
Books & Music
Career
Computers
Education
Family
Food & Wine
Health & Fitness
Hobbies & Crafts
Home & Garden
Money
News & Politics
Relationships
Religion & Spirituality
Sports
Travel & Culture
TV & Movies

dailyclick
Bored? Games!
Nutrition
Postcards
Take a Quiz
Rate My Photo

new
Action Movies
Bible Basics
Houseplants
Romance Movies
Creativity
Family Travel
Southwest USA


dailyclick
All times in EST

Full Schedule
g
g Civil Rights Site

BellaOnline's Civil Rights Editor

g

Hate Speech Is a Civil Right

Guest Author - Sylvia Cochran

With election fever being caught by media outlets on either side of the aisle, and with misrepresentations running rampant, it is only fair to take a closer look at hate speech. After all, the vilifying of talking heads and political candidates by their opponents is taking especially ugly turns this time around, and lest anyone forget the nooses hanging from a tree which provided the backdrop for more racially charged statements than the OJ trial, a close look at free speech is in fact in demand.

As hard as it is to swallow for those who are disgusted by the degrading rhetoric that seems to make fun of candidates’ religious persuasion, gender, moral standing, and political opinions and purport to report as “fact” baseless allegations levied against radio talk show hosts in an effort to engage in active race baiting, hate speech – which encompasses all of these activities – is indeed protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

It covers the ads run in newspapers, the online blogs which surreptitiously take words out of context, and the hate mongering books that make those who do not toe the party line (of either party) to look like the crew on a ship of fools. Therefore, you can make virtually any statement about anything, no matter how vile, wrong, and baseless, and get away with it.

A number of other countries have sought to curtail hate speech, and Germany as well as Ireland is leading the pack of those societies which are protecting minorities of any kind against defamation. The United States is content with responding to vile outbursts with corresponding vile outbursts and of course litigation, making the leader of the free world look and act more like a petulant child in a sandbox than the country that sets the tone others follow.

Yet is it truly wise to enact certain limitations to the First Amendment, even if they were to curtail the incidents of hate speech? Is there something to be gained from restricting the utterances of a free press (no matter how petty and ridiculous the headlines look at times) when you remember that in a dictatorship the censorship always focused on that which was permitted for the consumption of the general public?

Furthermore, is it not true that one person’s hate speech is simply someone else’s honest to goodness opinion? Where do you draw the line to differentiate bona fide expression of opinion from vile utterances that seek to demean and divide? Is the Christian credo “Jesus is Lord” not hate speech to someone who believes in Allah? Yet at the same time, is it not also part and parcel of the freedom of religion to be able to utter this belief in private as well as in public? Thus, would a tampering with and tempering of that which may be said not have far reaching consequences that not only affect one aspect of life, but a whole lot of others as well?

Last but not least, face it: being offended by something that is said is a personal response that is entirely arbitrary. It might be your PMS, religious upbringing, or shortsighted political leaning that causes your hackles to be raised. Fortunately, freedom of speech (including hate speech) does not equate with freedom from consequences, and thus a vibrant online blogosphere is sending volleys of hatred in all directions and no matter what offends you, you will be sure to find likeminded offended ones who will agree with virtually everything you believe in.

Thus, if you are fond of gay bashing, anti Semitism, race baiting, racism, misogyny, hate men, or find yourself in the Kool-Aid line of either the political right or left, hate speech is your Constitutional right. Have at it (but remember that the rest of us who are watching your rhetoric are not impressed and don’t think you’re cool, smart, or persuasive)!

This site needs an editor - click to learn more!

Add Hate+Speech+Is+a+Civil+Right to Twitter Add Hate+Speech+Is+a+Civil+Right to Facebook Add Hate+Speech+Is+a+Civil+Right to MySpace Add Hate+Speech+Is+a+Civil+Right to Del.icio.us Digg Hate+Speech+Is+a+Civil+Right Add Hate+Speech+Is+a+Civil+Right to Yahoo My Web Add Hate+Speech+Is+a+Civil+Right to Google Bookmarks Add Hate+Speech+Is+a+Civil+Right to Stumbleupon Add Hate+Speech+Is+a+Civil+Right to Reddit




RSS | Related Articles | Editor's Picks Articles | Top Ten Articles | Previous Features | Site Map


For FREE email updates, subscribe to the Civil Rights Newsletter


Past Issues


print
Printer Friendly
bookmark
Bookmark
tell friend
Tell a Friend
forum
Forum
email
Email Editor


Content copyright © 2014 by Sylvia Cochran. All rights reserved.
This content was written by Sylvia Cochran. If you wish to use this content in any manner, you need written permission. Contact BellaOnline Administration for details.

g


g features
Opportunities of the US civil rights struggles

How should black Americans treat each other

Graca Simbine Machel Mandela, a humanitarian

Archives | Site Map

forum
Forum
email
Contact

Past Issues
memberscenter


vote
Poetry
Daily
Weekly
Monthly
Less than Monthly



BellaOnline on Facebook
g


| About BellaOnline | Privacy Policy | Advertising | Become an Editor |
Website copyright © 2014 Minerva WebWorks LLC. All rights reserved.


BellaOnline Editor