logo
g Text Version
Beauty & Self
Books & Music
Career
Computers
Education
Family
Food & Wine
Health & Fitness
Hobbies & Crafts
Home & Garden
Money
News & Politics
Relationships
Religion & Spirituality
Sports
Travel & Culture
TV & Movies

dailyclick
Bored? Games!
Nutrition
Postcards
Take a Quiz
Rate My Photo

new
Bible Basics
Houseplants
Romance Movies
Creativity
Family Travel
Southwest USA
Irish Culture


dailyclick
All times in EST

Clairvoyance: 08:00 PM

Full Schedule
g
g Museums Site

BellaOnline's Museums Editor

g

Pop Culture in Museums


I recently came across an article on SmartMoney.com called “10 Things Museums Won’t Tell You.”

There was a lot that bugged me about that article, but one point was particularly irritating.

“High culture sure ain’t what it used to be,” writes Renee DeFranco.

She goes on to complain about “blockbuster” exhibits, saying that they are essentially dumbing-down the museum experience. She specifically cites a recent traveling exhibit on Star Wars that featured props from all six of the movies.

So, I ask, what is the criteria for what “should” be shown in a museum? Aren’t we as museum professionals charged with displaying rare items for the public to enjoy?

I don’t think everyone has a piece of the set of Star Wars sitting around their home. So, why isn’t an exhibit featuring unique Star Wars artifacts appropriate? Where else can people go to see such rare things? Isn’t that what museums are about? Showing people things that can’t see anywhere else?

I will agree that the hefty admission fee to these exhibits can be a turn off. I paid about $20 to see the Princess Diana exhibit, and I paid the same to see the Titanic exhibit a few years back.

But before you complain about shelling out your cash, think about the immense rental fees the host museum has to fork over for the privilege of displaying these exhibits!

Do you realize that an exhibit rental fee can be upwards of $100,000? This fee includes research and fabrication costs, which aren't cheap. Exhibitions often take years to develop! The host museum often has to pay even more for shipping, on top of the rental fee.

The museum has to recoup their expenditure by passing it on to the visitor, who will only pay for the experience if he or she truly wants to see it. Basic economics.

In many cases, I speculate that the museum barely breaks even. Often museums are interested in hosting these high-profile exhibits to generate media attention. Bring ‘em in to see Star Wars, and maybe they’ll come back to see something else in the future.

And I’m all for attracting an audience!

In my own exhibition schedule, I try to mix things up a bit to include topics that appeal to all kinds of visitors. I am aware that an exhibit exploring the history of fashion will probably attract women. So next I might plan something highlighting automobile art photos, or local business and industry.

I’ve created some heavy-hitting history exhibits on the Roaring Twenties or the Ohio & Erie Canal, interspersed with “fun” topics like a miniature circus display or the story of chocolate.

A blockbuster exhibit not only gets the community excited about a museum that has been in their backyards for decades, it provides a reason for local businesses to sponsor the exhibit. You can also have fun with special events and educational programming that will really excite your community.

What’s wrong with that?

DeFranco also notes, “High-profile exhibits help attract a broader array of visitors, but these blockbusters aren't always smash hits with the art community.”

To which I respond, who IS our audience, anyway?

The days of curators creating exhibits for other curators are long gone.

Today’s museums are focusing on the visitor experience, and I think the “art community” is feeling some growing pains from that. No longer must every exhibition have a “higher academic message.” Sometimes people want to see costumes from Star Wars.

DeFranco is exasperated that “museums are even tapping into online sites like YouTube and Facebook to spread the word to younger audiences.”

Um, isn’t that a GOOD thing?

Don’t we WANT children and teens to come to our museums and learn something? Shouldn’t we be courting the museum-goers (and supporters) of the future NOW by using technology to reach them?

While DeFranco had some valid points in her article, there were some serious blunders that clearly show she is not intimately familiar with this field.

Check out her full article and post your own thoughts in the forum!
Add Pop+Culture+in+Museums to Twitter Add Pop+Culture+in+Museums to Facebook Add Pop+Culture+in+Museums to MySpace Add Pop+Culture+in+Museums to Del.icio.us Digg Pop+Culture+in+Museums Add Pop+Culture+in+Museums to Yahoo My Web Add Pop+Culture+in+Museums to Google Bookmarks Add Pop+Culture+in+Museums to Stumbleupon Add Pop+Culture+in+Museums to Reddit




Click here for DeFranco's article
EXHIBIT REVIEW: Diana, A Celebration
EXHIBIT REVIEW: Norman Rockwell
RSS
Related Articles
Editor's Picks Articles
Top Ten Articles
Previous Features
Site Map




For FREE email updates, subscribe to the Museums Newsletter


Past Issues


print
Printer Friendly
bookmark
Bookmark
tell friend
Tell a Friend
forum
Forum
email
Email Editor


Content copyright © 2014 by Kim Kenney. All rights reserved.
This content was written by Kim Kenney. If you wish to use this content in any manner, you need written permission. Contact Kim Kenney for details.

g


g features
Building Exhibition Panels

The Benefits of Changing Exhibitions

Using Letters in Exhibitions

Archives | Site Map

forum
Forum
email
Contact

Past Issues
memberscenter


vote
Poetry
Daily
Weekly
Monthly
Less than Monthly



BellaOnline on Facebook
g


| About BellaOnline | Privacy Policy | Advertising | Become an Editor |
Website copyright © 2014 Minerva WebWorks LLC. All rights reserved.


BellaOnline Editor