logo
g Text Version
Auto
Beauty & Self
Books & Music
Career
Computers
Education
Family
Food & Wine
Health & Fitness
Hobbies & Crafts
Home & Garden
Money
News & Politics
Relationships
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Culture
Sports
Travel & Leisure
TV & Movies

dailyclick
Bored? Games!
Postcards
Astrology
Take a Quiz
Rate My Photo

new
Sewing
Jewelry Making
ABC Soaps
Fragrance
Movie Mistakes
Honeymoon
MP3 / iTunes


dailyclick
All times in EST

Low Carb: 8:00 PM

Full Schedule
g
g Philosophy Site
Cara Taylor Newman
BellaOnline's Philosophy Editor

g

Death Penalty – Does It Serve Justice?

The death penalty has always been a controversial issue. It seems that every scheduled execution has almost always called for people from both sides marching for their beliefs regardless of the degrees of the crime. It is during this time of media frenzy, we are asked to pause and think about our beliefs of using capital punishment.

An eye for an eye is a common human logic. Some calls it karma, some says, “you reap what you sow”, and while others simply agree with that the use of death penalty delivers justice. If a person has killed another human being or beings during a violent crime, he or she must suffer the same form of unnatural death. In doing so, the justice system might teach others not to commit similar crimes. Although this argument seems somehow logical, and simple, we need to stop and think if the capital punishment truly delivers justice.

Any murder is usually committed with violence, hatred or greed. However, will the use of another form of violence delivered by our judicial system truly solve our problem against violence? It is said that violence generates more violence, but not peace. How about those who have been wrongly convicted? This was not an unusual case prior to the maturity of the DNA analysis technology. What would you feel if you were the judge who sent the wrong person into the death chamber and later found out that you were wrong? Wouldn’t that make you a murderer as well?

In addition, instead of executing the murderer, would it be better for the society if the murderer serves his or her lifetime in prison reflecting upon the wrongful actions and hopefully makes him or herself a “productive” inmate for the remainder of his or her natural life? These are the questions we have to ask ourselves.

It is very understandable that families of the victims prefer to see proper and adequate punishment for the murderer. I would not disagree with the need for justice as one can only imagine the intense pain families of violent crimes suffer through. However, some argues that giving a person the death penalty is an easy way out. Why should the murderer be given a relatively fast death delivered by the capital punishment instead of spending his or her lifetime doing hard labor in prison? There are not right answers to this issue.

Please see the philosophy forum for the continuation of discussion on capital punishment…


Who Won’t You Take To The Desert Island?
Quotations on Ethics
RSS
Related Articles
Previous Features
Site Map


Content copyright © 2009 by Cara Taylor Newman. All rights reserved.
This content was written by Cara Taylor Newman. If you wish to use this content in any manner, you need written permission. Contact Cara Taylor Newman for details.

Digg! g delicious Save to Del.icio.us

g


For FREE email updates, subscribe to the Philosophy Newsletter


Past Issues


print
Printer Friendly
bookmark
Bookmark
tell friend
Tell a Friend
forum
Forum
email
Email Editor

g features
The Search of Womanhood - Step by Step

Interview with Kelly Reno: Mojave Philosophy

Forgiveness

Archives | Site Map

forum
Forum
email
Contact

Past Issues
memberscenter


vote
Growing a Garden
Veggies and Flowers
Veggies Only
Flowers Only
No Garden

g


| About BellaOnline | Privacy Policy | Advertising | Become an Editor |
Website copyright © 2009 Minerva WebWorks LLC. All rights reserved.


BellaOnline Editor