g Text Version
Beauty & Self
Books & Music
Food & Wine
Health & Fitness
Hobbies & Crafts
Home & Garden
News & Politics
Religion & Spirituality
Travel & Culture
TV & Movies

Bored? Games!
Take a Quiz
Rate My Photo

Natural Living
Folklore and Mythology
Distance Learning

All times in EST

Full Schedule
g SciFi TV Site

BellaOnline's SciFi TV Editor


Star Trek 101 - Philosophy

"Star Trek"'s original values are a bit different from whatís considered fashionable today. Rather than a dystopian or post-Apocalyptic future, with monsters of some type that must be killed, creator Gene Roddenberry theorized an optimistic future. Humans have evolved. They are enlightened, and good, and their Federation is a utopian organization. They try to understand other species, almost all of which are humanoid, rather than just shooting them. Basically, "Star Trek" championed "infinite diversity in infinite combinations."

There is no racism, no religious war - no differences based on gender, or skin color, or the fact that you have antennae while I do not. War doesnít exist on earth. Neither does poverty. While some have argued that the show actually depicts a Westernized paradise in which other cultures have been...well, assimilated, Earth is a world we want to live in. It's a secular, humanistic society where people help each other - and many of the episodes played out as morality tales rather than shoot-'em-ups. Action wasnít a huge part of "Star Trek" while Roddenberry was alive, but intelligence was.

Roddenberry reportedly said, "The whole show was an attempt to say that humanity will reach maturity and wisdom on the day that it begins not just to tolerate, but to take a special delight in differences in ideas and differences in life forms....If we cannot learn to actually enjoy those small differences, take a positive delight in those small differences between our own kind, here on this planet, then we do not deserve to go out into space and meet the diversity that is almost certainly out there."

In the "Star Trek" universe, the Prime Directive is key. Basically, the Prime Directive prohibits Starfleet personnel (like Kirk, and Spock, and Picard, etc.) from interfering in the natural development of a society. This causes all sorts of problems, of course, because basically it means that sometimes, Enterprise crews must allow people to be killed for the greater good.

After the death of Roddenberry, one can argue that some of this philosophy became diluted. And some fans of the various TV series will tell you that the two J.J. Abrams-helmed reboot films completely butchered it - not least because "Star Trek" was about rationality, and the new films didnít exactly stay true to physical laws. The new films have been indicted as less sophisticated, less subtle, without a message - they focus on the action and caricatures of the main characters. Some pop culture pundits have used the new movies to show how far we, as a people, have fallen when we can no longer appreciate the original "Trek"'s mentality. 

In "Into Darkness," for example, the main theme seems to be exactly counter to the Prime Directive, although sometimes itís hard to tell. Kirk spends the first 10 minutes of the film breaking the Prime Directive, and the impression weíre left with is that itís okay to break this cardinal rule of Starfleet, as long as the cause is just. 

Others will argue that "Star Trek" didnít get good until Roddenberry was gone, freeing the show from the strict storytelling limitations his vision put on it. After all, conflict is what drives drama, and some say that there wasnít enough of it in the original "Trek." Roddenberry died in 1991, just before "Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country" came out, during the run of "ST: NG" and before "ST:DS9." "Star Trek," being possibly more influenced by its contemporaries from that era such as "Babylon 5" and "The X-Files," took a darker, more complex turn with ongoing story arcs and wars and epic battles. These people may also point out that intellect and bravery are as important in the new ďStar TrekĒ films as the classic series - and with the secondary characters given more significant screen time than before. 

Nevertheless, what this has all proved is that "Star Trek" is capable of evolving to suit the current zeitgeist. It can stay pertinent in a changing world - if not staying exactly true to the optimistic future that Roddenberry envisioned, at least championing imagination and adventure; in short, encapsulating these words from Guinan (Whoopi Goldberg) in the "ST:NG" episode "Rascals": "That's the wonderful thing about crayons. They can take you to more places than a starship."

Add Star+Trek+101+%2D+Philosophy to Twitter Add Star+Trek+101+%2D+Philosophy to Facebook Add Star+Trek+101+%2D+Philosophy to MySpace Add Star+Trek+101+%2D+Philosophy to Digg Star+Trek+101+%2D+Philosophy Add Star+Trek+101+%2D+Philosophy to Yahoo My Web Add Star+Trek+101+%2D+Philosophy to Google Bookmarks Add Star+Trek+101+%2D+Philosophy to Stumbleupon Add Star+Trek+101+%2D+Philosophy to Reddit

RSS | Related Articles | Editor's Picks Articles | Top Ten Articles | Previous Features | Site Map

For FREE email updates, subscribe to the SciFi TV Newsletter

Past Issues

Printer Friendly
tell friend
Tell a Friend
Talk to Editor
Email Editor

Content copyright © 2018 by Helen Angela Lee. All rights reserved.
This content was written by Helen Angela Lee. If you wish to use this content in any manner, you need written permission. Contact Helen Angela Lee for details.


g features
Book Review - The Grace of Kings by Ken Liu

Sharknado 101

Book Review - Tomorrow and Tomorrow

Archives | Site Map


Past Issues

Note: BellaOnline uses cookies to help provide a consistent user experience. Our advertisers may use cookies to help customize ads. Please contact us with any question about our cookie use.

Summertime Foods
Corn on the Cob
Burgers on the Grill
Apple Pie


| About BellaOnline | Privacy Policy | Advertising | Become an Editor |
Website copyright © 2018 Minerva WebWorks LLC. All rights reserved.

BellaOnline Editor