logo
g Text Version
Beauty & Self
Books & Music
Career
Computers
Education
Family
Food & Wine
Health & Fitness
Hobbies & Crafts
Home & Garden
Money
News & Politics
Relationships
Religion & Spirituality
Sports
Travel & Culture
TV & Movies

dailyclick
Bored? Games!
Nutrition
Postcards
Take a Quiz
Rate My Photo

new
European Travel
Action Movies
Bible Basics
Houseplants
Romance Movies
Creativity
Family Travel


dailyclick
All times in EST

Clairvoyance: 08:00 PM

Full Schedule
g
g Democratic Party Site

BellaOnline's Democratic Party Editor

g

Can We Feed the Hungry More Efficiently?

Guest Author - Tracey-Kay Caldwell

According to the United Nations, eight hundred fifty million people worldwide suffer from chronic malnutrition. You would think the four billion in food aid that America provides the world would go a long way to alleviating that hunger. However, because of inane regulations that benefit corporate America, most of the money never reaches the hungry of the world. According to the Government Accountability Office, sixty-five percent of federal food aid expenditures are not even spent on food. By law, the U.S. Agency for International Development and other federal agencies cannot write checks to feed the hungry. They must buy American-grown food from American conglomerates; seventy-five percent of the food must be shipped on American-flagged vessels. This is a good deal for domestic corporations, but it deprives the hungry of much needed food.
The amount of food delivered by United States aid programs has declined by more than 50 percent over the past five years, due to rising transportation and business costs.

State Department and Office of Management and Budget have been lobbying to convert some of the food aid to cash grants for years, and the White House seems to be listening. Congress is due to pass a new farm bill this fall, and Senator Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) has proposed a tiny pilot program to award one hundred million dollars in cash grants over four years. Sounds like a good idea? Well some people donít think so. No surprise, the program is opposed by shipping companies and agribusiness giants, such as Archer Daniels Midland. But it might surprise you to know that it also opposed by nongovernmental organizations (NGO) such as Feed the Children and the American Red Cross. The United States donates the food aid to the NGO aid groups as an indirect form of financing. The groups sell the products on the market in poor countries and use the money to finance their antipoverty programs. It amounts to about $180 million a year. The sale of food aid to generate cash for humanitarian programs is known as monetization.

CARE and Catholic Relief Services, first and second in money raised through the current system of monetization, say they recover only seventy to eighty percent of what the United States paid for the commodities and shipping. Care has announced that it will phase out of the program, no longer accepting food aid from the program. Care explained that the three major problems with monetization are first, monetization requires intensive management and is fraught with risks. Procurement, shipping, commodity management, and commercial transactions are management intensive, costly, and fraught with legal and financial risks. Second, monetization is economically inefficient. Purchasing food in the United States, shipping it overseas, and then selling it to generate funds for food security programs is far less cost-effective than the logical alternative of simply providing cash to fund food security programs. Third, when monetization involves open-market sale of commodities to generate cash, which is usually the case, it inevitably causes commercial displacement. It can therefore be harmful to traders and local farmers, and can undermine the development of local markets, which is detrimental to longer-term food security objectives.

There are a lot of issues for Congress to consider in this years farm bill. Eliminating hunger in an efficient way ought to be its top priority. Senator Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) proposed pilot program will only consume a small portion of the total billís funding, but it is a program that could help us down the path to government that is more efficient.


Food Aid Reform

This site needs an editor - click to learn more!

Add Can+We+Feed+the+Hungry+More+Efficiently%3F to Twitter Add Can+We+Feed+the+Hungry+More+Efficiently%3F to Facebook Add Can+We+Feed+the+Hungry+More+Efficiently%3F to MySpace Add Can+We+Feed+the+Hungry+More+Efficiently%3F to Del.icio.us Digg Can+We+Feed+the+Hungry+More+Efficiently%3F Add Can+We+Feed+the+Hungry+More+Efficiently%3F to Yahoo My Web Add Can+We+Feed+the+Hungry+More+Efficiently%3F to Google Bookmarks Add Can+We+Feed+the+Hungry+More+Efficiently%3F to Stumbleupon Add Can+We+Feed+the+Hungry+More+Efficiently%3F to Reddit




RSS | Related Articles | Editor's Picks Articles | Top Ten Articles | Previous Features | Site Map


For FREE email updates, subscribe to the Democratic Party Newsletter


Past Issues


print
Printer Friendly
bookmark
Bookmark
tell friend
Tell a Friend
forum
Forum
email
Email Editor


Content copyright © 2014 by Tracey-Kay Caldwell. All rights reserved.
This content was written by Tracey-Kay Caldwell. If you wish to use this content in any manner, you need written permission. Contact BellaOnline Administration for details.

g


g features
How to Lobby Congress

Funding Public Broadcasting

Help Women and Girls Worldwide

Archives | Site Map

forum
Forum
email
Contact

Past Issues
memberscenter


vote
Poetry
Daily
Weekly
Monthly
Less than Monthly



BellaOnline on Facebook
g


| About BellaOnline | Privacy Policy | Advertising | Become an Editor |
Website copyright © 2014 Minerva WebWorks LLC. All rights reserved.


BellaOnline Editor