logo
g Text Version
Beauty & Self
Books & Music
Career
Computers
Education
Family
Food & Wine
Health & Fitness
Hobbies & Crafts
Home & Garden
Money
News & Politics
Relationships
Religion & Spirituality
Sports
Travel & Culture
TV & Movies

dailyclick
Bored? Games!
Nutrition
Postcards
Take a Quiz
Rate My Photo

new
European Travel
Action Movies
Bible Basics
Houseplants
Romance Movies
Creativity
Family Travel


dailyclick
All times in EST

Full Schedule
g
g History Site

BellaOnline's History Editor

g

Narrowing Down the Case of the Civil War


Narrowing down the cause of the Civil War is impossible as there is no one reason aside from the arrogance of each side for wanting control and power. Yet the nullification of the Compromise of 1850 was the catalyst that set the players into motion moving the nation to the bloody conflict. All other acts such as the Dred Scott Decision and the election of President Abraham Lincoln were just more fuel on the fire. It was the admission of states as free or slave that pushed the nation over the edge.

In 1850, California was allowed to enter as a free state “in exchange for concessions granted to slaveholders.” (1) When it was nullified four years later, it lit the spark that would lead to the Civil War. New states could now enter with “constitutions that could provide slavery and preserved the principle of state rights over Federal restrictions.” (2) The power between the North and the South could drastically change which would reach up all the way to the halls of Congress. The more slave states that would enter the union, the more power the Southern slaveholders would have. This battle between North and South had been in existence since the early colonies. The two cultures struggled for power. During the 1800s, that was no different as the North became representative of the free states and the South of the slave states. The Compromise of 1850 seemed to settle the conflict as it gave each side something that pacified them. The Nullification of that act sent the political world of the nation into a tailspin.

From the Nullification, the expansion of slavery into the territories became a hot topic. If territories could come into the Union as anything they wanted, that meant slavery could spread like wildfire into the territories and thus as states. The congressional powers would be thrown askew. From this intense watching, the Dred Scott Decision came about as a slave declared he was free as he had lived for several years in a free state. As the decision came down that he was not free, the question of Congress’ power to legislate territories came into question. (3) The whole topic was going into a crazy circle.

The Election of Lincoln was a move for a peaceful compromise that the South Carolina ‘hot heads’ would not accept as well as most of the South. His middle ground stance was not enough to pacify them. (4) They feared that the election of Lincoln was just another move of the North to remove all the South’s power. Instead of trying to work with the new administration, the ‘hot heads’ gave a knee jerk reaction that would bloody most of the Union.

While each of these actions and many more could be argued as causes of the Civil War, it was the Nullification of the Compromise of 1850 that set it all in motion. The Compromise was just that…a compromise. When revoked, it threw the two sides back into the boxing arena giving them no choice but to duke it out. Neither side wanted to give in. Each side wanted to win and hold the power. The domino effect of the Nullification would prove more deadly than any had ever imagined.



Bibliography

(1) David J. Eicher, The Longest Night: A Military History of the Civil War, (New York: Touchstone, 2001), 44.
(2) Ibid.
(3) Michael F. Holt, The Fate of Their Country: Politicians, Slavery Extension, and the Coming of the Civil War, (New York: Hill and Wang, 2004), 119.
(4) Eric Foner, Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men : The Ideology of the Republican Party before the Civil War with a New Introductory Essay, (Cary, NC, USA: Oxford University Press, USA, 1995), 263.

Add Narrowing+Down+the+Case+of+the+Civil+War to Twitter Add Narrowing+Down+the+Case+of+the+Civil+War to Facebook Add Narrowing+Down+the+Case+of+the+Civil+War to MySpace Add Narrowing+Down+the+Case+of+the+Civil+War to Del.icio.us Digg Narrowing+Down+the+Case+of+the+Civil+War Add Narrowing+Down+the+Case+of+the+Civil+War to Yahoo My Web Add Narrowing+Down+the+Case+of+the+Civil+War to Google Bookmarks Add Narrowing+Down+the+Case+of+the+Civil+War to Stumbleupon Add Narrowing+Down+the+Case+of+the+Civil+War to Reddit



 



RSS | Related Articles | Editor's Picks Articles | Top Ten Articles | Previous Features | Site Map




For FREE email updates, subscribe to the History Newsletter


Past Issues


print
Printer Friendly
bookmark
Bookmark
tell friend
Tell a Friend
forum
Forum
email
Email Editor


Content copyright © 2014 by Rebecca Graf. All rights reserved.
This content was written by Rebecca Graf. If you wish to use this content in any manner, you need written permission. Contact Rebecca Graf for details.

g


g features
Science Support of Slavery

Politics Voice For Slavery

Slavery Justified Through the Life of the Slave

Archives | Site Map

forum
Forum
email
Contact

Past Issues
memberscenter


vote
Poetry
Daily
Weekly
Monthly
Less than Monthly



BellaOnline on Facebook
g


| About BellaOnline | Privacy Policy | Advertising | Become an Editor |
Website copyright © 2014 Minerva WebWorks LLC. All rights reserved.


BellaOnline Editor