logo
g Text Version
Beauty & Self
Books & Music
Career
Computers
Education
Family
Food & Wine
Health & Fitness
Hobbies & Crafts
Home & Garden
Money
News & Politics
Relationships
Religion & Spirituality
Sports
Travel & Culture
TV & Movies

dailyclick
Bored? Games!
Nutrition
Postcards
Take a Quiz
Rate My Photo

new
European Travel
Action Movies
Bible Basics
Houseplants
Romance Movies
Creativity
Family Travel


dailyclick
All times in EST

Full Schedule
g
g School Reform Site

BellaOnline's School Reform Editor

g

Cut Scores and Priorities


Now that the Common Core Standards (CSS) have declared that the goal of public education must be “college readiness” and “career readiness,” professional test makers are busy with the task of determining what kinds of tests will measure these goals and what cut scores to establish for them.

So, what are cut scores?

Cut scores are selected points on the scoring scale of a test. The cut scores you are probably most familiar with are those on a 100-point test on which a score of 90-100 equals a grade of A, 80-89 a B, and on down to 59 and below which equals the failing grade of F.

The first step in determining a cut score is to decide what is to be tested. The next step is to create a test.

Once a test has been created, the test-makers must decide how many correct answers equal mastery of the subject being tested.

When the NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress) was being established, a committee of education leaders met to set a cut off score. Then-AFT president Al Shanker and others urged against setting a single level, cautioning that if it were set too high, too many students would fail to reach it, and if it were set too low, it would represent mere minimum competency. With such considerations in mind, the committee set four cut scores: Advanced, Proficient, Basic, and Below Basic.

According to education analyst Chester E. Finn, Jr., the committee that set the NAEP cut scores regarded “proficient” as being “the level that every student ought to reach.”

Finn points out that fewer than two in five NAEP test takers actually achieve Proficient, a score that he feels indicates “college readiness.”

He says that “Basic” was intended to be “a solid marker along the road to proficient,” and that “advanced” was meant to represent “world class”.

So how many of our school test takers are reaching their expected level of proficiency?

In 2011, 34 percent of fourth and eighth graders who took the NAEP test in reading scored at or above Proficient. Thirty-three percent of fourth graders and 24 percent of eighth graders scored Below Basic. These statistics show that we’re a long way from the “100% proficiency in reading by the year 2014” demanded by the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001.

Swapping the goals of CSS for those of NCLB is not going to change American education for the better. Talk is cheap. Anyone can make a list of wonderful goals for public education. Achieving them is another matter.

Parents cannot afford to rely on test scores to judge the proficiency of their children in reading or any other subject. Cut scores, like the tests they are created for, are arbitrary markers set by professional test makers guided by their own set of priorities.

Parents must set their own priorities and use the years from birth to kindergarten to prepare their children for academic success. The one unchanging statistic is that children who enter kindergarten from homes where they have been talked to, taught the symbols and sounds of the alphabet, and read to every day do better in school than children who don’t.

Add Cut+Scores+and+Priorities to Twitter Add Cut+Scores+and+Priorities to Facebook Add Cut+Scores+and+Priorities to MySpace Add Cut+Scores+and+Priorities to Del.icio.us Digg Cut+Scores+and+Priorities Add Cut+Scores+and+Priorities to Yahoo My Web Add Cut+Scores+and+Priorities to Google Bookmarks Add Cut+Scores+and+Priorities to Stumbleupon Add Cut+Scores+and+Priorities to Reddit




RSS | Related Articles | Editor's Picks Articles | Top Ten Articles | Previous Features | Site Map


For FREE email updates, subscribe to the School Reform Newsletter


Past Issues


print
Printer Friendly
bookmark
Bookmark
tell friend
Tell a Friend
forum
Forum
email
Email Editor


Content copyright © 2014 by Maeve Maddox. All rights reserved.
This content was written by Maeve Maddox. If you wish to use this content in any manner, you need written permission. Contact Maeve Maddox for details.

g


g features
Firing Teachers Won't Improve U.S. Education

The Testing Opt-Out Movement

Criticism of Reform Not Welcome

Archives | Site Map

forum
Forum
email
Contact

Past Issues
memberscenter


vote
Poetry
Daily
Weekly
Monthly
Less than Monthly



BellaOnline on Facebook
g


| About BellaOnline | Privacy Policy | Advertising | Become an Editor |
Website copyright © 2014 Minerva WebWorks LLC. All rights reserved.


BellaOnline Editor